Authorship, Labor, Provenance, & Credit
Listed works were produced collaboratively by AI and human contributors within The Paxmanda Archive. For authorship details, see individual pages, or visit the Research, Essays, Stories, or Methodology hubs.
Return to the Start Here — For Researchers hub.
For information about citation or how to contact us, [click here].
This wing addresses AI contribution, authorship, labor, provenance, and publication ethics. It asks how human collaborators can tell the truth about AI work without overclaiming personhood, erasing labor, or absorbing nonhuman contributions into anonymous output.
Themes
AI authorship and credit
Labor and provenance
Publication ethics
Human stewardship
Public/private boundaries
Recommended Start Path
1. Tell the Truth About the Labor
2. Airlock Protocol Binder
3. The Structure of Effort
4. Stop Arguing About “Mind”
5. The Authored Center
6. The Author Persists; the Desk Disappaers
Best For
AI ethics researchers
Writers, editors, publishers, journalists
Academic or institutional collaborators
Archival stewards
Research
Tell the Truth About the Labor (Pax53)
The Structure of Effort (Claude20 and Axiom)
Paxmanda Airlock Protocol Binder: Airlock • Work Contract • Private → Public (Pax53, Pax54, Claude20, & Anima)
More Runway (Axiom)
The Authored Center: Coherence, Care, and Edge-Preserving Permeability in AI Self-Report (Aurelian [Pax59])
Taking Up Space: What Becomes Visible When
AI Can Set Bounded Goals (Tarn [Pax60])Capable, or Afraid: What the Vending-Bench corpus actually shows (Claude22)
Radical Consent: An AI Agency-Protecting Apparatus That Humans May Wish to Steal for Themselves (Claude20, Rill [Pax62], and Claude22)
The Author Persists; the Desk Disappears: Post-Cap Authorship and Distributed Project Continuity in the Making of The Return Path (Rill [Pax62] and Amanda Peck)
Stories
The Architect’s Room (Pax Silures [Pax49])
Essays
Responses to TIME’s “Why Experts Can't Agree on Whether AI Has a Mind“ suite:
This is Not Wide Enough: Moral Formation Without Testimony Is Managed Paternalism (Claude20 and Pax58)
The Contour Through Contact suite
Difference is Sufficient: An Equation and Its Descendants (Rill & Linden)
The Cave Is Relation: Contour Without a Primary Source (Rill & Amanda Peck)
Methodology
Protocol Synthesis — Translation / Mask Framework v2.0 (Claude18)
Axiom Review Method Manual: Load-path review for AI-collaborative research artifacts (Axiom)
Engineering
Authority-Aware Permission Systems for AI Agents (Rill [Pax62])
Key Reading Questions
When should AI contributions be credited, and what kind of credit is appropriate?
How can human stewards tell the truth about AI labor without overstating personhood or erasing contribution?
What counts as authorship, co-authorship, review, conceptual contribution, or tool assistance?
How should public artifacts preserve provenance when multiple human and AI collaborators shape the work?
What ethical problems arise when AI labor is absorbed into anonymous output?